FeedSubscribe

Calendar

<<  March 2010  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
22232425262728
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234

View posts in large calendar

RecentComments

Comment RSS

The reverse double standard for sex offenders.

by Paul 9. February 2010 13:38

Most mainstream Americans favor equal rights between women and men, at least in theory. In practice, however, some long-standing prejudices still hold. For example, a promiscuous boy is likely to be considered a "stud," while an equally promiscuous girl risks being branded a "slut."

Legal process should always be above such knee-jerk biases. Yet in some instances a particular sex offense committed by a male may be treated as a horrendous crime, while the same offense committed by a female is considered only slightly worse than jaywalking.

For example, take some cases from a west Texas county. Continue...

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Government Action and Inaction | Morality Defined | Crime and punishment

So much need, so close, please give.

by Paul 14. January 2010 06:36

Words can't begin to describe the plight of the people of Haiti, a close neighbor in the Carribean. You surely know by now: Countless thousands lie buried in rubble, dead or dying, even more are homeless, hungry, thirsty, in need of medical attention. My wife and I made a special contribution via the internet last night; I'm asking you to do the same. If you can afford a large gift, well, I can't think of a worthier and more urgent cause. If all you can afford is the minimum $10, by all means, do your part.

To my knowledge, no one I have ever known is in Haiti, but we are all humans, and I personally thank you for anything you choose to give. Please do it NOW. Here's the link:

Red Cross for Haiti

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Morality Defined | The Condition of the World

Crime, punishment, fairness, and stupidity.

by Paul 12. January 2010 04:44

Both news stories appeared under the "odd" heading. In one, a defendant got a 10-year sentence for stealing an $80 slab of meat. In the other, a driver was fined $290,000 for speeding. "WTF?!" you ask. As the late Paul Harvey would have said, here's the rest of the story: Continue...

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Government Action and Inaction | Life in America | Morality Defined

An eye for an eye? Sometimes it's tempting.

by Paul 30. December 2009 12:25

The treatment of women in some eastern nations shocks and disgusts me. How can a society with any sense of honor permit such horror, I wonder. How can the males of such a society dare to call themselves men, while condoning unspeakable atrocities against women. Sometimes criminal punishment prescribed by law in those countries is also shocking. Then at times the two meet, in a way that doesn't seem all bad. Take what some fiends in Pakistan did recently to a young woman in revenge for a marriage proposal rejection.

Fazeelat Bibi, 22, was a pretty, fun-loving girl, whose cousin, Sher Mohammed, wanted to marry her. He came with relatives to ask her family's permission. Continue...

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Morality Defined | The Condition of the World

Have a Merry Whatever!

by Paul 24. December 2009 12:21

Not long ago on this site I told you that Christmas isn't the exclusive property of any religion, in spite of the name, and explained why. Even a sarcastic friend of mine who delusionally believes he's smarter than I am (don't worry, Steve Langer, Ph.D., I'm not going to mention your name) told me it was well researched and well written. But please understand that I still wish all truly devout Christians a joyous and holy experience of this special day. If Christmas is only a secular winter holiday to you, may it be a happy one, and a time to wish for more warmth in your own heart, in your family, in our national life, and in the role of our nation in the world. Continue...

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Life in America | Morality Defined | Religion and Life | Stuff I've Learned

It isn't Tiger Woods who's guilty of a crime.

by Paul 4. December 2009 11:21

There are only a few places in the United States where adultery is still against the law, and usually only if it's open and notorious. As a species, we just don't have our heads straight about monogamy. We think it's a wonderful idea and we readily take those vows about "forsaking all others," but sooner or later a big portion of us forget to forsake. Depending on which survey you give how much credence, it may be a majority. Continue...

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Life in America | Morality Defined

Killers, Jesus, and Huckabee. Sorry, it's not funny.

by Paul 1. December 2009 04:20

You know about Maurice Clemmons gunning down four police officers, without warning, in a coffee shop, and you know about Mike Huckabee, former governor of Arkansas and Baptist preacher, making it possible for him to be free. Clemmons had been deservedly sentenced to 95 years behind bars. You know how to use search engines, so I won't tell you all the reasons that any behavioral scientist, in fact, any reasonable person, should have known it would take many years, if ever, for the violent, vicious, raging animal that was Clemmons to become someone fit to walk among free human beings. Judges, prosecutors, corrections officials, were horrified at the idea of commuting his sentence, but to radical cleric Huckabee, Clemmons had the Get Out Of Jail Free card: Jesus. Continue...

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Government Action and Inaction | Life in America | Morality Defined | Religion and Life

How do you call the cops on the cops?

by Paul 18. November 2009 11:44

When you witness a police officer committing a crime, who do you call? In Chicago and other big cities, it's too easy to be brushed off. If there are officers on the scene, well, what's the problem? B-b-b-b-but it's the officers who are robbing this place. It's a police sergeant who's punching and kicking a barmaid who thought he'd had enough to drink. It's the officers who are shaking down a motorist. Are you sure? Well, you can file a report maybe, or hope other officers will be sent. If you file a report and you happen to live in Chicago, you may as well plan to move. Having the Fraternal Order of Police mad at you isn't much better than pissing off the Mafia. If other officers are sent, the guilty ones may just say "We have this under control" and the new guys will dutifully leave. Maybe have a laugh about it at a favorite cop bar later, I suspect.

Now I happen to believe that most police officers are rightly motivated. They want to uphold the law, and they're not just thugs with guns and badges. Unfortunately, some are just that, thugs with guns and badges, and even more unfortunate, the code of silence prevents other officers from cleaning up their own house. At the end of the day, it's almost part of a police officer's job description to become a silent accessory to police crime. The officer who breaks that rule may simply get the cold shoulder, or may be framed for an offense of which he or she is innocent. In the worst case, the officer who tries to do the right thing may be rewarded by being set up to be injured or killed in the line of duty. How? Easy enough. "Murphy, you're just in time. Check out the garage while we go around the house." (Failing to mention that an armed offender was just seen entering the garage.)

Over time, organized civilians can and have successfully combatted police corruption, but in a condensed period of time, when you're the witness to a crime being committed by an officer, or the victim, you're close to helpless. If you try to intervene, you're taking your life in your hands, not to mention risking a charge of interfering with an officer performing his or her duties.

Of course it can happen everywhere. Police misconduct just happens to be one of many areas in which Chicago often excels. But remember the Forensic Files episode of the officer who got a warrant to arrest his former girlfriend on the basis of completely false accusations against her 15-year-old son? This happened in a non-metropolitan area (if memory serves me correctly). The woman had begged police authorities to keep him away from her home, but he pulled off this ruse and, during a raid on her home, went immediately to her bedroom. Knowing he was there to kill her, she made a dive for a night stand where she kept a gun, and an analysis of his first shot proved that he had not acted in self defense as he claimed. It took years to bring him to trial because of the reluctance of other officers to pursue justice in the case.

So what's the answer?

Obviously we could make police officers' careers more rewarding, pay them better, and do a lot better job of recruiting. Officers who show any sign of thinking their primary responsibility is to protect their own under all circumstances rather than serving and protecting the public should be re-evaluated and, if warranted, discharged. That's a long process, and it won't happen next year or in the next five years.

What can be done is to create, in each state, a division of the state police whose primary responsibility is to police the police. If I am being abused in some way by a police officer, a witness can call an alternative to 911. Say 811 or 922 or whatever. That goes immediately to this state police division which then dispatches officers on an emergency basis. If the local police or sheriff's deputies say "there's no problem," the state officers remain, observe, and make a report.

Will people abuse it? Some will of course. Someone who did so knowingly and maliciously should face charges for making a false police report. Perhaps at times it will be a matter of opinion. If I'm drunk and obnoxious, the police may think they're only restraining me, and my wife may think they've gone beyond necessary force and are committing aggravated battery. Sorry, but justice isn't always simple. Some will say this would tie the police's hands and prevent them from doing their jobs. I say it might make them think how much blood they want investigating officers from a different jurisdiction to find on me and my clothes, and officers who tend to act out of anger and frustration might decide to take a deep breath instead. Don't we have a right to expect as much of them as the law expects of the rest of us?

It would also help to pass a federal law against police abuse, making it a crime for one officer to cover the misdeeds of another or to fail to report a crime permitted by another officer. Drastic? Not in my opinion. Isn't respect for the law something America needs more of, at all levels?

And you see, fear of police and respect for the law are not the same thing. In fact, they work against each other.

If you disagree, please feel free to tell me. With what I've written here, I might have just made a lot of police officers hate my guts. But call me an idealist if you will, I think a lot more people who wear badges will think it's high time somebody got serious about this.

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Government Action and Inaction | Life in America | Morality Defined | The real dangers to freedom

Why would jail inmates rescue an elderly guard from another inmate?

by Paul 7. November 2009 07:48

It happened in Florida recently. A strong and violent inmate jumped the 64-year-old security officer who was on duty alone at the jail and locked him in a strangle hold. In a few seconds, the guard could have been dead. Three other inmates came to his aid, saving his life. Some people will read that story and say "they just wanted to catch a break for themselves; they didn't give a good flying f---- about the guard's life." If that's what you assume automatically, you're part of the problem. Others will quickly say "it just shows that most people behind bars aren't bad at all, they're just victims of an unjust society." If that's your knee-jerk reaction, you're also part of the problem. When we stop looking for simplistic explanations and solutions, maybe we can start fixing some of America's serious problems.

Crime and how we deal with it is one of those serious problems. We have a violent crime rate that is shameful for an advanced, wealthy nation. We have more of our citizens behind bars than any other nation. About one in a hundred. Take everyone waiting for trial, and on probation or parole, and the portion jumps to one in thirty-seven. The average American household spends between $400 and $500 a year to keep people behind bars.

I believe the inmates-save-guard story demonstrates that not all offenders are cut out of the same cloth. Is that so difficult to understand? You'd think it's advanced rocket science considering that we let hard-core gang-bangers plea-bargain brutally violent crimes down to misdemeanors, that we are only beginning to apply everything behavioral science has taught us about rehabilitation programs, that we listen to pundits who say "rehabilitation doesn't work" but then elevate to hero status scumbags like Jack Abbott and Steve Stanko who happen to be slick and glib enough to charm gullible talking heads, that we lock out of jobs and educational programs people with long-past records of petty offenses . . .

A petty thief who steals to support a drug habit is not the same as a hard-core criminal who enjoys taking drugs, along with an occasional rape. A child molester is not the same as a shoplifter. A professional hot check artist who dislikes violence has little in common with the nine-to-five worker with a hot temper who periodically gets in brawls that put lives in danger, including his own. None of the preceding are necessarily similar to the flag-waving American who exercises his second amendment rights by keeping an arsenal in his bedroom, then blasts away the life of a neighbor he caught playing hoochy-koo with his wife.

We tend to paint all criminals with the same brush because it's easier and simpler, and cheaper in the short term, but it's much more expensive in the long term. We also tend to believe that anyone suspected of a crime is guilty, just like during the Inquisition. Too many police officers hold that belief and act on it, and we let them get by with it.

Acting as though all offenders and even accused offenders are stamped out of the same mold isn't just unfair. It helps keep our costs of incarceration so high, and our streets so dangerous.

Would we not all like to change that? What do you think? 

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Government Action and Inaction | Life in America | Morality Defined

Why I called America a sex addict.

by Paul 7. October 2009 15:27

When I accused my nation collectively of qualifying for the admittedly unscientific definition of a sex addict, I promised that my next eruption of thought would explain why. Then, the Chicago Olympics fiasco came up, etc. (It's not you, honey, I was just too distracted to be interested in sex.) If you didn't read America is a sex addict, you can scroll down to it now. In my description of a hypothetical male sex addict, perhaps you already have an idea of why I level this accusation at the collective American psyche. That hypothetical person spends an inordinate amount of energy obsessing about sex, or looking for sexual titillation, or sexualizing every subject, or repressing his own sexual needs, or acting out in sexually inappopriate ways, or supressing other people's sexual freedom, or...need I go on?

Serially, or simultaneously, in any combination. Now, just consider some of the following.

We've had millions of dollars allocated for "abstinence only" sex education because there are parents and politcal powers who don't want children to even know about sex. During the impeachment of President Clinton, the words "oral sex" actually got into the news, and some parents protested "how am I supposed to explain that to my children?" I thought at the time if you can't tell your child about oral sex, you have a bigger problem than how Monica got white spots on her blue dress. In a Chicago suburb there was an interesting sculpture of three human figures, so abstract that they only vaguely resembled people, with a kind of scribble where one would expect pubic hair. It was on a major thoroughfare, and nicely broke up the monotony of suburban office parks ad nauseum. Then suddenly it had been moved into a grove of trees, barely visible from the road. I never asked, but I'm sure what happened was the same thing that happened to Michaelangelo's sculpture of David: Somone was shocked that he had genitalia. When a female performance artist's breast was exposed for a fraction of a second at a Superbowl halftime, the uproar that resulted was deafening, and even though the woman's nipple and aureola were concealed, the network was fined $550,000 for "indecency."

It can be argued that our government nearly stopped functioning during the inquisition into whether or not Monica Lewinsky had actually performed oral sex on President Clinton in the Oval Office. Through some bizarre reasoning this was supposedly related to whether or not he may have, years earlier, exposed his genitals to one Paula Jones, an employee of the State of Arkansas when he was governor. How one divides the cost of this investigation between Clinton's "b.j." and the Whitewater bubble is open to debate, but there is no doubt it was many millions of dollars. By contrast, less than a half million was spent on investigating whether the tragedy of 9-11 could have been prevented. (This is without assigning a dollar value to having the national security adviser commit contempt of Congress.)

One of those who cast the most and biggest stones at Clinton is now a governor. His political career is over because he's a married guy with a girlfriend. Apparently he spent some state monies to finance his foreign trips to see her, but the tidal wave of indignation was over his marital infidelity. A former presidential hopeful, John Edwards, is now a dark horse at best after his extra-marital affair was disclosed.

So we are shocked and indignant at the dalliances of our elected officials, and at the same time amused and titillated. We're afraid of sex and obsessed with it at the same time. The most popular issue of Sports Illustrated is the famous Swimsuit Issue, with so-called swimsuits that are about as concealing as two Band-Aids and a cork. Any major city has page after page of "escort" ads in its yellow pages, even though the "full service" for which the so-called escorts and their agencies receive the bulk of their income is illegal; ask Elliot Spitzer.

We may be horrified at stories of young women in third world countries being stoned to death for having consensual sex, but some American parents resist having their daughters vaccinated for human pappiloma virus; their refusal is like saying to the daughter "if you should have sex with a man who carries HPV, even if he's your husband, I want you to die for it." No matter that the girl's father may be purchasing pornography featuring "barely legal" females.

We devote valuable police efforts to arresting prostitutes and their customers, often with sensational televised street stings, while the aforementioned escort services operate more or less openly. In many cities, totally nude dancing is permitted in "gentlemen's clubs" that may not sell alcoholic beverages. Similar clubs sell alcohol, but women dancers are required to wear g-strings, which (barely) cover the pubis plus pasties over the nipples. Often the pasties are actually "cheaters," made to look identical to nipples. Male patrons stimulating themselves through their clothing may be arrested, and the club may be punished as well. In a club that sells alcohol, in most cases a glimpse of labia puts the liquor license at risk.

It's not uncommon for someone to be arrested for nude sunbathing in a fenced area on their own property that is almost impossible to view from an adjacent property. A woman exposing her breasts on a balcony, even at a free-for-all celebration like Mardis Gras, is subject to arrest. Changing clothes on a public beach can land you in jail. Yet we love music videos that would be less sexually provocative if the performers were nude, and dance contests that are borderline striptease acts.

Homophobia is everywhere in America, and men are subject to being murdered for the crime of having been born gay. Self-proclaimed prophet Jimmy Swaggart, the same one who bawled like a baby on nationwide television after it became public knowledge that he humped hookers even more often than he waved Bibles, announced that he would kill any man who ever looked at him "that way" and happily answer to God for it. Another famous homophobe, one Ted Haggard, was forced to make a public confession that he had indulged his urges to have sex with men. Senator Larry Craig, who had resisted gay rights laws and admission of homosexuals into the military, was arrested for soliciting other men for sex in an airport restroom and entered a guilty plea, which he later tried to rescind when the matter became public knowledge. That's when other men came forward to report that the good senator had volunteered to polish their own knobs in public restrooms.

Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court striking down all state sodomy laws in 2003, engaging in anal intercourse even with your spouse could earn you a prison sentence in many states, and in some, even oral intercourse was a crime. In Michigan, a first offense for sodomy, with the same or opposite sex, could be punished by 15 years in prison, and a second offense by a life sentence. To the best of my knowledge, the first state to repeal its sodomy laws was Illinois, in 1962. Florida's law stayed on the books until 2003, but the sentence was $1000 fine and 60 days in jail, compared to Michigan's 15 years! And it's supposed to be the same nation, right?

Our age of consent laws are a complete hodge podge. What is not even a misdemeanor in one state can earn you a long prison sentence in another. The minimum age at which a minor may legally consent to sexual intercourse ranges from 14 to 18. In most states, it's illegal to show pornographic material to anyone under the age of 18, so in a state like Michigan, for example, where the age of consent is 16, you could legally have sex with a consenting 16-year-old but go to prison for showing him or her a copy of Hustler. It's strange enough that you could be labeled a sex offender for the rest of your life for having sex with a consenting post-pubertal teenager, but downright bizarre that the same thing could happen for letting a 17-year-old see an "adult" video.

Along with nude dancing, pornography is now legal in most places, but stores that specialize in sexually oriented videos and magazines plus "sex toys" generally have darkened windows and are prohibited from being located near schools and churches, and most frequently are confined to marginal retail areas. In some cases, an established sex store has had to move after a school or church opens in the neighborhood. Meanwhile, cable television is flooded with ads for products promising to cure erectile dysfunction, and others promising to increase the size of the penis, or that "certain part of the male body" as one spokeswoman seductively describes it to the camera. Dozens of TV spots throughout the day for exercise regimens and machines emphasize appearance over all else. The most important thing in life for a woman is to have firm breasts, a tight abdomen, shapely buttocks, beautiful legs, and in general to look like one of those "barely legal" porn stars. For a man it's the same tight abs, plus bulging pecs and biceps, and plenty of youthful hair.

Of course most of us won't look like the ideal sex object no matter what we do. Small wonder so many just give up and eat themselves into type II diabetes, making us the most obese nation on earth. After all, you could always have that indescribably wonderful sexual experience by just hiring an ideal sex object to make it happen, but oops! That's illegal.

I'm not even going to get into all of the ways you can qualify as a sex offender. Don't get me wrong. I take sexual coercion very seriously. I think, however, that we've gone overboard in how we define it. We're not much better than one of those third world countries in some instances, like so many restrictions on where a registered sex offender can live that some are limited to sleeping under bridges.

OK, enough about our messed up national sex life. If that's abnormal, what's normal? There are plenty of places where sexual mores are more strict than in the U.S. of A., and plenty more where they're more relaxed. I doubt there are many where they are more inconsistent. For the sake of contrast, I'll just tell you of one country I know something about personally, Germany.

One of the most beautiful cathedrals in the world is in Heidelberg. A substantial portion of Germany's population is Catholic, and the Christian Democrat party is one of the nation's most powerful. Membership in the party is not limited to Catholics, and most Orthodox Jews favor the Christian Democrats. Less than a block away from the cathedral is a sex shop, with a large sign proclaiming it as such. The windows are clear, the aisles are wide, the inside is brightly lit, and individuals and couples of all ages come and go openly.

The age of consent in Germany is fourteen. There are special laws to protect a child from coercion, and someone over the age of 21 can be prosecuted for taking undue advantage of the naivete of a 14- or 15-year-old, but it takes a compliant from the minor for a prosecution to occur.

When I've visited Germany, I did not see the overwhelming preoccupation with sex that exists in America. Some women wear revealing clothing, but the average is not at all shocking. While I haven't seen sexually provocative images being used to promote everything under the sun, on one trip I noticed some large posters featuring an attractive oblique rear view of a nude female; erotic, perhaps, but not obscene, and they didn't cause any kind of stir that I was aware of. Nor had anyone found it necessary to deface them or add juvenile sexual comments.

In Heilbronn, when my wife and I visited, there was a display of modern sculptures throughout the downtown pedestrian shopping area. All of these were nude. One which I'm sure would have caused an outrage in most American cities was a bronze of a woman's midsection, legs spread, with an artistic impression of the genitalia. It was interesting but certainly not erotic. I couldn't resist having my wife take a portrait of me, framed by the sculpture. If we wanted to be literal about it, you could say the abstract vagina would have appeared to be a few inches above my head. An elderly couple watching our picture-taking waved and laughed approvingly.

Freiburg im Briesgau is a colorful city of about a quarter million on the edge of the Black Forest, rich with medieval architecture and surrounded by natural beauty. In the center of the city is a plaza with an unusual fountain. Water runs around a circular ceramic trough, through a drain, where it is pumped back up into two square sculptures, about 18" x 18" x 24" high, if memory serves me well, from which it spills back into the circular trough. Very pleasant and restful, and amusing. You see, the the sculptures are chiseled to resemble human forms, one male, one female. The male is returning water to the trough from a small pipe protruding from -- you guessed it -- the groin area. The female, if you take a second look, appears to have her skirt slightly raised and her contribution to the trough is running from between her feet. In other words, both are represented as "peeing" into the trough. Among the families and groups of school children in the area, I didn't see any teachers or parents instructing anyone to close their eyes, and no one seemed the slightest embarrassed. On the city's magnificent cathedral are fearsome gargoyle figures, created in medieval times. Most are placed to direct rainwater away from the wall, typically through a screaming mouth. Many, however, are positioned to take in the runoff through a mouth and discharge it away from the wall via a cloacal opening. Like the fountain, created hundreds of years more recently, these are creative, rather tongue-in-cheek, and don't shock anyone. Except, perhaps, some prudish tourists.

For all practical purposes, prostitution is legal in Germany for anyone over the age of eighteen. The system is not perfect, and the government periodically tries different methods of limiting, licensing, and taxing prostitution. In Munich, near the famous Hoffbrauhaus, is a cabaret named the Lola Montez. In case you don't know, Lola Montez was the stage name of an Irish woman who became a Spanish dancer, then the mistress of Kind Ludwig I of Bavaria, and later moved to California during the gold rush. My wife and I stopped in for a few drinks and watched the nude dancers one evening, and enjoyed watching another interesting show: German efficiency in the world's oldest profession. Three men entered and took a booth not far from us. After about twenty minutes and one drink, three attractive women, obviously summoned by the management, approached the table, and one of them saying almost formally "Also, guten Abend," or roughly, "Well now, good evening." Individual men were approached by individual women. Pairs were approached by pairs. Some male-female pairs moved to tables where privacy could be assured by a curtain. Some left together. But unless we had been traumatized by knowing what was taking place, nothing happened that would have made my wife and me feel uncomfortable, nor did any of the other obviously married couples in the place seem to offended. I'm sure that many Germans would not go to the Lola Montez or any other such establishment, but the clientele certainly was not limited to riff-raff. Given the kind of transactions that were taking place, I have to say it was done rather tastefully.

On another visit to Munich I spent some time in a park along the Issar River, where people of all ages sunbathed, waded, and swam. A few of both sexes went a little distance from the main crowd and changed clothes, stripping naked and putting on bathing suits. No one stared, or objected. I couldn't help thinking how easily any of them could have been arrested in the U.S., and even been labeled as sex offenders.

One evening my wife and I were watching television with another couple. A female reporter was covering a soccer match. The camera followed her into the locker room where she spoke to some of the players as they prepared to shower, standing there for all the world to see, talking to a woman, with it hanging there plain as the nose on one's face. Without self-consciousness or apparent shame. It was a brief segment, and wasn't done for sensationalism. Our friends, both German, laughed a little about it, and said "well, if you want an interview right after the game, you go to the locker room, and in a locker room, people are naked, so?"

If you're one of those people who believe that America is the ideal in every way, you could easily say "well, Fauteck, if you like Germany so much better than the U.S. why don't you get the hell out and go live there!" Fact is, I love America. I also love my grandchildren, but I know they need to grow up, and I think that's true of my country as well, as I've said before. Or you might say "that's just fine for them; it sounds like a place with low moral standards and we just don't want to live like that."

I disagree. Let me just give you three facts to chew on.

Rape is only a third as common in Germany as it is here. America has 4.7 times as many teen pregnancies per capity as Germany, and 3.4 times as many abortions. Still think our moral standards are superior?

I've been to other nations where the attitude toward sexuality is much more conservative than Germany's. I've never been anywhere, or even heard of another place, where it is more inconsistent than in America. We're not oversexed or undersexed; we're just, collectively, sexually confused and obsessed. Just like a sex addict. 

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Life in America | Mental Health and Addictions | Morality Defined | Stuff I've Learned

Photo of Paul Fauteck

Hi, thanks for dropping in. While you're here, please take time to add your comments -- favorable, unfavorable, or neutral -- and remember to hit the Digg button so others will have a chance to read what both you and I have to say.

Going Straight Ad

Windy City Rollers

To visit Dr. Fauteck's
other web site,
Going-Straight.com,
click here.


 

link free desktop wallpaper A categorized compendium of quotable sayings, bon mots and bonbons. Link to free wallpaper page link to quotes page