FeedSubscribe

Calendar

<<  March 2010  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
22232425262728
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234

View posts in large calendar

RecentComments

Comment RSS

....and to the corporation for which it stands...

by Paul 22. January 2010 12:17

The audience booed during the movie Network when Ned Beatty, as the character Arthur Jensen, proclaimed that business was more important than nationhood:

"...There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM, and ITT, and AT&T, and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide, and Exxon. We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies... The world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable bylaws of business. The world is a business..."

Repugnant thought. While Americans wouldn't approve a system like that of the former Soviet Union, where the government could wield absolute power, I fear that we don't recognize an equal threat, a system in which megacorporations wield the absolute power. That threat is a lot closer.

The Soviet Union fell apart for a number of reasons, not the least of which was their illusion that all commercial enterprise could be operated by the government. The result was an inefficient, unwieldy, and hugely unpopular system of feudalism which they obscenely labeled socialism. Suppose on the other hand that a cabal of business tycoons own the government, lock, stock, and barrel. Instead of a nation of the people, by the people, for the people, we'd be residents of a mega-commune owned and managed by the board of directors.

Simple in some ways. No EPA or FDA. No haggling over laws and endless emails urging you to sign petitions or call your lawmakers. Laws are written by committees appointed by the board. No anti-trust actions. Why should a company go to court over its desire to buy up another company? Ultimately there'd be only one make of automobile, only one chain of food stores, only one brand of blue jeans. The post office would, of course, be abolished, as UPS, Fed-Ex, DHL, and a few others, merge into one efficient carrier that can charge whatever it pleases.

"But at least a government run by business would be 'kinder and gentler' than the communists ever were," some might say.

"Really?" I answer. Megacorporations used their megadollars to suppress the truth about abestos, cold-bloodedly sentencing legions of workers to slow, painful death from mesothelioma. There is plenty of reason to believe that another megacorporation ordered the "accidental" death of Karen Silkwood. Jeffrey Wigand's life was turned upside down by a megacorporation's campaign to destroy him financially and destroy his reputation when he exposed the truth about what goes into cigarets and the scientific data that was being deliberate suppressed. Corporations are not controlled by human beings. Corporations are controlled by money.

Anyone who isn't simply out to lunch knows that political candidates are dependent on donations for their campaigns. Theoretically, a lawmaker is forbidden to take a bribe for voting one way or the other, but there are numerous ways that megacorporations can channel riches to those they favor. That's why the threat is much closer than that of an authoritarian government powered by political ideology.

Now, it's closer than ever. The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, has essentially removed all contraints on corporate funding of candidates. Corporate interests can fund campaigns all they wish, owning and operating politicians to their hearts' content, if they had hearts. The rules that were in place were inadequate and weak, but now, there simply are no rules. The Supreme Court now says that corporations enjoy first amendment rights, just like living, breathing, human American citizens.

It's time for us true living, breathing, human American citizens to take note. I'm not one to scream that the sky is falling every time some political entity makes what I think is a monumental goof. The world isn't going to fall apart, and America isn't going to disappear. There is, however, a serious danger that it will soon change in tragic ways.

Comments? Click Here

Tags:

Government Action and Inaction | Life in America | The real dangers to freedom

Comments

1/23/2010 3:58:41 AM #

Elizabeth Miller

DEAR!! Paul,

Between you and Rex Ihave some hope. But at the same time, I feel frustrated at the lack o conern shown by those who SHOULD be up in arms.

As my health gets slowly worse and worse  I am tempted to give in and just enjoy what I can.  Yet, I feel an obligation to my children and my grandchildren to fight  this encroaching loss of freedom--hey, am I a Libertarian??--and the frightening acceptance of so many.  I am so delighted that you keep up the fight.Thanks, Elizabeth

Elizabeth Miller United States

1/30/2010 11:45:07 AM #

Me

Digg. No. You aren't worth it. And besides, Digg sucks.

Oh, and nice shitty banner at the roller derby.

Me United States

3/7/2010 1:46:20 PM #

Paul

Well! Apparently I've offended someone big time. There are many people who don't like me. Most of them are educated enough to articulate their reasons, and educated enough to come up with a more grown-up adjective than "shitty," and courageous enough to leave a legitimate email address.

Paul United States

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



Photo of Paul Fauteck

Hi, thanks for dropping in. While you're here, please take time to add your comments -- favorable, unfavorable, or neutral -- and remember to hit the Digg button so others will have a chance to read what both you and I have to say.

Going Straight Ad

Windy City Rollers

To visit Dr. Fauteck's
other web site,
Going-Straight.com,
click here.


 

link free desktop wallpaper A categorized compendium of quotable sayings, bon mots and bonbons. Link to free wallpaper page link to quotes page